Kategorie «serien stream kostenlos»

Inside wikileaks stream

Inside Wikileaks Stream Ähnliche Videos

Der erblondete Benedict Cumberbatch ist in Inside Wikileaks – Die fünfte Gewalt in der Rolle des Julian Assange zu sehen. Außerdem mit dabei: Daniel Brühl als​. Der auf Tatsachen basierende Thriller erzählt die Geschichte von WikiLeaks-​Gründer Julian Assange (Benedict Cumberbatch) und seinem Kollegen Daniel Berg . Moderner Politthtriller, der die Geschichte von WikiLeaks und ihres Inside Wikileaks - Die fünfte Macht. (71)2h Format: Prime Video (streaming online video). Gibt es Inside WikiLeaks - Die fünfte Gewalt auf Netflix, Amazon, Sky Ticket? Jetzt online Stream legal finden! Hier erfährst du, bei welchen Anbietern du Inside Wikileaks – Die fünfte Gewalt streamen kannst! Natürlich haben wir auch viele weitere Infos zu Inside.

inside wikileaks stream

Der auf Tatsachen basierende Thriller erzählt die Geschichte von WikiLeaks-​Gründer Julian Assange (Benedict Cumberbatch) und seinem Kollegen Daniel Berg . veröffentlichte eine Webseite, die sich dem Schutz von Whistleblowern verschrieben hatte, eine ganze Lawine geheimer US-Unterlagen, die ein Zeitalter. An einer Hacker Convention des Chaos Computer Clubs in Berlin trifft der Informatiker Daniel Domscheit-Berg auf den charismatischen Australier Julian.

That source was former Army intelligence analyst Bradley Manning, eventually convicted of violating the Espionage Act and other crimes and sentenced to 35 years in prison and has since assumed the identity Chelsea Manning.

This should be seen as an important movie, regardless of one's opinion of the people and events portrayed.

First off, WikiLeaks along with the connections established among people around the world on social media websites helped lead to the Arab Spring and other significant political changes in many different countries over the few years following Manning's actions.

Secondly, whether you agree or disagree with Assange's approach to journalism or whether you even consider him a journalist at all , this movie raises important questions that existed before the world even heard of Julian Assange, will exist into the foreseeable future, and may never go away.

When does the freedom of the press enshrined in the U. Constitution conflict with the basic human rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness promised in the Declaration of Independence?

Is there any way to hold people who post news on the internet accountable without violating our most treasured freedoms?

Where is the line between whistle-blower and traitor — and who decides where to draw that line? This film suggests the importance of asking all these questions and more without coming right out and asking them.

This film also avoids suggesting that there are any easy answers. As entertainment, many will find "The Fifth Estate" a bit dry, a bit long or both.

The director does his best to keep the film engaging by getting the best out of his talented cast, editing and scoring the film to create tension and using creative settings and camera work to represent certain concepts and events in the story.

However, the real strength of this film is in its educational value and its ability to get the audience to think about some significant issues that face our country and our world - right now, today - and aren't going away any time soon.

At the end of the day, isn't that one of the things that we want and really need movies to do — at least some of the time? That is a question that I think this film does answer and that answer is a resounding "yes"!

For the significance of this film, its execution and its overall entertainment value, I give "The Fifth Estate" a "B".

Sign In. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Full Cast and Crew. Release Dates. Official Sites.

Company Credits. Technical Specs. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites. User Reviews.

User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos. Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions.

Rate This. A dramatic thriller based on real events that reveals the quest to expose the deceptions and corruptions of power that turned an Internet upstart into the 21st century's most fiercely debated organization.

Director: Bill Condon. Added to Watchlist. From metacritic. Everything New on Disney Plus in June.

Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. Edit Cast Cast overview, first billed only: Peter Capaldi Alan Rusbridger David Thewlis Nick Davies Anatole Taubman Holger Stark Alexander Beyer Marcel Rosenbach Philip Bretherton Bill Keller Dan Stevens Ian Katz Daniel Brühl Daniel Berg Benedict Cumberbatch Julian Assange Jamie Blackley Ziggy Ludger Pistor Supervisor Alicia Vikander Anke Domscheit Michael Kranz Otto Christin Nichols Otto's Girlfriend Christoph Franken Game Console Hacker Ben Rook Learn more More Like This.

Hawking TV Movie Biography Drama. Snowden Biography Crime Drama. The life of a children's book author is turned upside down when his daughter goes missing.

Wreckers He also chronicles the personal relationship between Assange and himself from Assange being his idol and philosophical genius to a rather unattractive, arrogant and self serving leader, paranoid about his team and making unpredictable decisions.

I am not a much of WikiLeaks fans nor hater, only a curious citizen. I found this book, literally, hidden among other management themed books.

I am I am not a much of WikiLeaks fans nor hater, only a curious citizen. I am not oblivious on the impacts and controversies of WikiLeaks and Julian Assange up to date, however, I am having difficulties on getting away from the impression that this book was written filled with anger by its writer and its sole purpose was actually just smear campaigning.

So, I might defend that my review was solely based on the way the book flowed. The substance of the book is primarily on the author's relationships, personally and professionally, with Assange.

It was quite often I found myself confused on what was the author's aim or what had ticked them off. I mean the quarrels were like something bound to happen when you were working with someone else.

You don't always agreeable with someone, yet, I sensed the book was pushing Assange's character as someone difficult, paranoid, irrational, unprofessional, and etc.

Meanwhile, the author was exactly the opposite and the victim of his former friend and employer. I am sure that someone with high profile as Assange would have to come with his own eccentricity and egocentricity, so what?!

This guy is responsible for all of that chaos on public information and made US on fire, surely there's must be work ethics that could be shared in the book, instead of mentioning : how much he likes to be immersed in his laptop.

It's not like Assange is god or immortal or perfect but I just couldn't find that essential moment where their relationships have gone sour.

Was it money? Was it authority? Was it technical? The way that the author repeatedly claimed he was not jealous, sort of made me curious.

Most of the times, people making denials are usually admitting them. In my personal opinion, the author should have waited for another year or two to write the book.

To calm down and just jolted down what was necessary or no. Because, the publishing time was not quite long after he quit in the end of which only made people, most probably WikiLeaks supporters, assumed that he had grudges on the founder.

Well, I can see that he had hold grudges over the chats between the author and Assange when he was suspended. He wrote that Assange was dictator, but, I found it on his behalf that had started the fire.

I think the book's just too premature as Assange and WikiLeaks are developing news so it got the hook.

It would be a great book and inspiring for people to defend on free public information campaigns if only it was not too occupied in 'clarifying' the different characters.

Jun 18, Gwern rated it liked it. I give it 3 stars solely because it is a unique primary source about WikiLeaks; if this was not from a principal player, it would not be worth reading as it is shallow incomplete garbage.

Negatives: the writing is absolutely atrocious, although I don't know if this is due to the translation from the German or whether the co-author journalist screwed it all up.

And Domscheit comes off in some passages as too ignorant to even understand Assange's beliefs for example, I seem to recall that there wa I give it 3 stars solely because it is a unique primary source about WikiLeaks; if this was not from a principal player, it would not be worth reading as it is shallow incomplete garbage.

And Domscheit comes off in some passages as too ignorant to even understand Assange's beliefs for example, I seem to recall that there was an irritating passage where Domscheit mocks Assange's use of red light to help his sleep - even though this is standard chronobiology, that blue light influences melatonin secretion to retard the sleep cycle and keep one awake!

One is strongly reminded of Russell's famous description of Xenophon's writings on Socrates: "A stupid man's report of what a clever man says is never accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something that he can understand.

I would rather be reported by my bitterest enemy among philosophers than by a friend innocent of philosophy. It's also bizarrely lacking in technical details, which is the one part one would hope a supposed geek like Domscheit would at least make sure his book got right!

Probably also thanks to the journalist. Still, many interesting bits. I was amused to learn that the Iceland laws were based by Assange in part on Stephenson's Cryptonomicon - again, makes sense in a curious way.

The author, a computer scientist who worked in IT security before coming to WikiLeaks, became the number two man and spokesman for the organization.

In the book he chronicles the evolution and inner workings of WikiLeaks, his relationship with the founder, Julian Assange, and finally, his eventual withdrawal from the organization.

In an ironic turn of events, Wikileaks itself became as secretive as the powerful institutions it sought to expose.

I think as citizens we all want to see as much transparency as possible on the part of big business and government, and this is why we all cheer when WikiLeaks uncovers some of the unethical and unsavory aspects of big business or the spying habits of governments.

Everyone always enjoys a real-life David and Goliath story, which is what WikiLeaks is This book has a lot to recommend it, the whole extraordinary phenomena that is WikiLeaks, and a fascinating glimpse into the individual that is Julian Assange, by the insider who lived it.

Sep 04, Bryan Kelly rated it liked it. Like many I share a cautious attitude toward the personal attacks Domscheit-Berg makes on Assange.

However, the narrative he tells reasonably explains Wikileaks' unfortunate fracturing. I was persuaded by the read to believe that the goals of Wikileaks are sound and that the project does represent a necessary revolution in transparency, which is big because two years ago, at the time of Cablegate, I wanted Assange dead.

I find it unfortunate that Domscheit-Berg's decentralized approach with Open Like many I share a cautious attitude toward the personal attacks Domscheit-Berg makes on Assange.

I find it unfortunate that Domscheit-Berg's decentralized approach with Openleaks appears not to be working, if the lack of dynamism on the current website is any indication.

In all this is a good read that will infuriate those of us who were skeptical of Assange's personal vision from the beginning, even while it persuades that in a more perfect world Wikileaks would be the way the media is ultimately supposed to operate.

Dec 24, Daniel Mihai Popescu rated it really liked it. Very good. If I knew all that in it would have been better. Mar 17, Kathy rated it it was amazing.

Awesome book, definately worth a read if you think Assange is a hero. Domscheit-Berg is carefull not to throw any unjust punches Assange's way, and in fact he seems to still like the guy, despite what he did.

May 05, Beth Laterza rated it liked it. Very personal. Very interesting. Feb 18, Stelarov B rated it did not like it. Lies, fabrications, rage, jealousy, by a defector who deleted hundreds of thousands of documents for ever.

Was the money good Daniel? What's the price of your soul? I don't know Julian Assange, but what I have seen of him talking in the media and his actions made me think he was an; at least no one I would want for a roommate.

This insider view from would-be OpenLeaks founder Domscheit-Berg further supports that. Aside from that character study of a selfish, egoistic, and manipulative Assange, this is the story of how some obvious issues with the supposed WikiLeaks philosophy became problematic: wanting info to be free but trying to keep operational details I don't know Julian Assange, but what I have seen of him talking in the media and his actions made me think he was an; at least no one I would want for a roommate.

Aside from that character study of a selfish, egoistic, and manipulative Assange, this is the story of how some obvious issues with the supposed WikiLeaks philosophy became problematic: wanting info to be free but trying to keep operational details and leakers secret; Assange and his organization appearing hypocritical in their actions; leaking information more harmful than helpful such as identifiers of vulnerable people, etc.

The avalanche documents overwhelmed efforts in reviewing the documents, including some of the sources of the information.

WikiLeaks began to error in some releases, hold back material it could not edit, and begun thus choosing what to release and back away from its purist approach of releasing in order without preference.

Also interesting was the leaks of Scientology works I didn't know they did that , and various fraternity ceremonies with the resultant heat from those.

Aug 02, Pantteri4 rated it really liked it. This is a very interesting book. Its protagonist is one of the people responsible for running Wikileaks in its critical stages around , starting with when he, soon to become the deputy in Wikileaks, first met with Julian Assange, and ending in Assange's arrest in Britain and the fallout in relationships and technology in Wikileaks itself.

One of the hallmarks of interesting books are that they not only make the reader think, but also can arise powerful feelings among the readership.

The This is a very interesting book. The fact that, among others, some of the reviewers of the book here at Goodreads refer to Domscheit-Berg as "prick" and worse, attests to the power of the book in those terms.

If one is to take a more neutral look, the book describes a dynamic of revolutionary-minded organization and a typical power struggle for leadership between a clearly sociopathic and narcisistic leader, and a deputy who suffers from an inferiority complex in relation to the said sociopath.

The book, taken in itself, thus reads as a description of group psychology and jockeying for power and limelight of individuals, the very same individuals who are quick to retreat into moral posturing and accusations of conspiracies.

In the end, the book describes a tragedy: an almost-complete destruction of a potentially very powerful organization, brought about by its pathologically self-interested, vain and paranoid leaders.

In that, it certainly provides an interesting, eye-catching story that is easy to follow, lest you refrain from quickly taking sides for or against the protagonist - if anything comes clear from this book, it is that Wikileaks had no heroes.

Mar 16, Socraticgadfly rated it really liked it. Julian Assange -- "Daniel has a disease, it's some kind of borderline paranoid schizophrenia.

While it's quite possible that WikiLeaks would never have taken off the way it did without Assange, from Daniel Domscheit-Berg's account of his time there, it's also clear, by the s Julian Assange -- "Daniel has a disease, it's some kind of borderline paranoid schizophrenia.

While it's quite possible that WikiLeaks would never have taken off the way it did without Assange, from Daniel Domscheit-Berg's account of his time there, it's also clear, by the same token, that its later stumbles and problems wouldn't have happened without Assange at the helm, either.

And that's not to mention Assange's personal legal problems, which, whatever happened in Sweden, seem to likely have a high degree of self-inflictedness.

The ultimate picture? A modernized version of something like the House of Atreus, with a king devouring his own children. No, this book isn't perfect.

It does have elements of the he said, she said, It may have been rushed to market a bit to play off Assange's Swedish rape charges and British hearing.

And, it sadly lacks in pre-WL backgrounding of Assange, which would have given more depth to Domscheit-Berg's psychological profiling of Assange.

With those caveats, though, it's still a good book. A very good book, given those circumstances. And, given that Domscheit-Berg occasionally turns the psychological spotlight on himself, and notes that he wasn't the only person inside WikiLeaks to have serious problems with Assange, this book is most definitely not sour grapes.

That said, given the libertarian, solo nature of what drives many hacker or quasi-hacker types on the Web, I fear that is easier said than done.

Fantastic account on the roots of WikiLeaks becoming a political player rather than an engine for the democratization of information and a whistleblowers' safe heaven and publication outlet.

It is my opinion that WikiLeaks died when Daniel left, and it is now a plaything of a celebrity spoiled sociopath. Read it and weep at the missed opportunity, and as a cautionary tale against the need for a progressive strongman: they might improve things for a while, but the backlash against them cause more h Fantastic account on the roots of WikiLeaks becoming a political player rather than an engine for the democratization of information and a whistleblowers' safe heaven and publication outlet.

Read it and weep at the missed opportunity, and as a cautionary tale against the need for a progressive strongman: they might improve things for a while, but the backlash against them cause more harm than good overall, and the disappointment of disillusioned supporters a generational black mark.

Nov 02, Louis Lapides rated it really liked it. The genesis of how WL started gets a fair explanation by the author and offers the reader needed insight into the controversial cyber-organization.

In light of this book, one can better understand how to read between the lines in regards to the statements and behavior by WL co-founder Julian Assange.

Nov 06, Chris rated it liked it. The book is slant towards exposing the character of Julian Assange - much is not spoken about the leaks, their preparation, and impact.

In the end, Julian Assange is portrayed as neurotic activist who founded WikiLeaks and his character led to the demise of the whistleblowing platform.

It doesn't go by saying WikiLeaks is described as a highly disorganised institution. While this book will not win literary awards, it is a fascinating account on the first years of Wikileaks, on the motivation of the people behind it.

It also helps to understand how a structure devoted to transparency in politics and journalism can turn into a tool for the far right, in the US as well as in Europe.

Difficult story It wasn't a horrible book but it was difficult to read to the end. Much good information and wisdom shared by the author but I still had the sense it was more a story centered on the sour grapes between two egos.

Nov 09, Michaela Fischer rated it really liked it Shelves: non-fiction , biography , activism , technology , read.

Dec 15, Isa rated it liked it. Interesting the first part, in the second half you get more about the relationship author-founder than Wikileaks itself.

Nov 11, Shannon McMahon rated it really liked it. An interesting look inside WikiLeaks and an insight into Julian Assange.

It does a good job of showing you how WikiLeaks was working it's rise and ultimately it's sort of collapse.

Mar 26, Bapaul rated it liked it. Nice to read. May 06, David Roberts rated it it was amazing. The book I read to research this post was Inside WikiLeaks by Daniel Domscheit-Berg et al which is an excellent book which I bought at a car boot sale.

This book was published in and is definitely the kind of controversial book I should be reviewing. WikiLeaks was a website where if someone wanted to release confidential information they could anonymously and hopefully avoid prosecution.

There were discrepancies however with while most of the information was freely available there were payp The book I read to research this post was Inside WikiLeaks by Daniel Domscheit-Berg et al which is an excellent book which I bought at a car boot sale.

There were discrepancies however with while most of the information was freely available there were paypal accounts for donations that accrued a lot of money and they experimented with the idea of auctioning information to the highest bidder obviously among news agencies.

There are other similar sites. The author of this site was a very high up staff member at WikiLeaks sometimes credited with being a co founder with Julian Assange who did call the shots and ultimately suspended the author from his job.

It's interested that Julian was a high profile celebrity in Germany but always said they secret services would try and set up a sex scandal to try and get him deported to America to face charges connected with WikiLeaks.

I don't know if he is guilty or not of the rape charges that were brought against him but I think it is wrong that if he goes back to Sweden to face the charges he almost certainly will be deported to America.

There were many scandals reported on WikiLeaks among them was one connected to the banking crash in Iceland. Apparently the banks there gave loans with little collateral required to people for millions in many cases and it looked like these people were benefiting from the slump.

I now many councils and businesses in Britain invested in Icelandic banks due to the high interest offered and I think if they haven't already they will get there money back eventually but surely the management in those banks had a good idea what was happening and profited from it.

They did have demonstrations in Iceland over the story so I'm not saying anything that controversial. I did really enjoy reading this book and would definitely recommend it.

Sep 20, Andrew Skretvedt rated it liked it Shelves: seen-at-library. If half of what Berg recounts about Assange's behavior is true, WikiLeaks is not a platform whistleblowers should trust to look out for their best interests, or preserve what's in the public's best interest regarding the information whistleblowers bring.

WikiLeaks could be utilizing their users' submissions to advance its own agenda in some fashion. That's one fear that comes from reading this book.

Berg's stories would mean that Assange's personality and private life have become far too enmeshed If half of what Berg recounts about Assange's behavior is true, WikiLeaks is not a platform whistleblowers should trust to look out for their best interests, or preserve what's in the public's best interest regarding the information whistleblowers bring.

Berg's stories would mean that Assange's personality and private life have become far too enmeshed with WikiLeaks for the platform to remain credible.

I find that very interesting. The mainstream media also regard Assange and WikiLeaks as about one-and-the-same.

It may be that the whole effort to get Assange to face Swedish sexual-assault charges isn't a grand conspiracy with the USA to get Assange in custody in a country where he could be extradited to face US charges, as Assange seems to have often suggested.

This could be just par-for-the-course fabulous confabulation on Assange's part, as Berg's side of the story gently suggests.

It's a soap opera, boy howdy. What may also be true is that Assange's much-hyped "nuclear" option of document release doesn't exist, as Berg's team had taken custody of the platform's unreleased material ca.

But, in the aftermath, it seems that Berg and the original core IT team at WikiLeaks couldn't do much better in launching their own platform, OpenLeaks.

That rocket failed to launch. I wonder who has control of that unpublished material from that era now. Is it Berg? A group of trustees?

WikiLeaks, on the other hand, could be dysfunctional if Berg's account is accurate, yet it still appears to function.

The bulwark of human freedom could do with less centralization on this front, however. Feb 21, Jennifer rated it really liked it Shelves: non-fiction.

The story that emerges in Inside WikiLeaks is that in its early years the organisation was neither well funded nor well organised.

If someone knew where the server was located they could have shut WikiLeaks down permanently.

Tails is an operating system launched from a USB stick or a DVD that aim to leaves no traces when the computer is shut down after use and automatically routes your internet traffic through Tor.

Our submission system works hard to preserve your anonymity, but we recommend you also take some of your own precautions.

Please review these basic guidelines. If you have a very large submission, or a submission with a complex format, or are a high-risk source, please contact us.

In our experience it is always possible to find a custom solution for even the most seemingly difficult situations. If the computer you are uploading from could subsequently be audited in an investigation, consider using a computer that is not easily tied to you.

Technical users can also use Tails to help ensure you do not leave any records of your submission on the computer. If you have any issues talk to WikiLeaks.

We are the global experts in source protection — it is a complex field. Even those who mean well often do not have the experience or expertise to advise properly.

This includes other media organisations. If you are a high-risk source, avoid saying anything or doing anything after submitting which might promote suspicion.

In particular, you should try to stick to your normal routine and behaviour. If you are a high-risk source and the computer you prepared your submission on, or uploaded it from, could subsequently be audited in an investigation, we recommend that you format and dispose of the computer hard drive and any other storage media you used.

In particular, hard drives retain data after formatting which may be visible to a digital forensics team and flash media USB sticks, memory cards and SSD drives retain data even after a secure erasure.

If you used flash media to store sensitive data, it is important to destroy the media. If you do this and are a high-risk source you should make sure there are no traces of the clean-up, since such traces themselves may draw suspicion.

If a legal action is brought against you as a result of your submission, there are organisations that may help you. The Courage Foundation is an international organisation dedicated to the protection of journalistic sources.

WikiLeaks publishes documents of political or historical importance that are censored or otherwise suppressed. We specialise in strategic global publishing and large archives.

The following is the address of our secure site where you can anonymously upload your documents to WikiLeaks editors. You can only access this submissions system through Tor.

See our Tor tab for more information. We also advise you to read our tips for sources before submitting. What has been made public so far about WikiLeaks is only a small fraction of the truth.

A computer scientist who worked in IT security prior to devoting himself full-time to WikiLeaks, he remains committed to freedom of information on the Internet.

Today he is working on a more transparent secret-sharing website called OpenLeaks, developed by former WikiLeaks people, to be launched in early Get A Copy.

Hardcover , pages. Published February 15th by Crown first published More Details Original Title. Other Editions Friend Reviews.

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Inside WikiLeaks , please sign up.

Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 3. Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Apr 03, Peter rated it it was ok Recommends it for: nobody in particular Shelves: politics , nonfiction.

A difficult book to judge. In large part, it seems to be one side of a battle over a broken relationship. Not knowing the other side, how am I to judge who's right?

And why should I bother? In this particular case, the dispute is between the book's co-author, Daniel Domscheit-Berg, and famed Wikileaks director Julian Assange.

As for the truth of the details, how the hell am I to know? It's believable that Assange is an asshole.

On the other hand, that's just if you go by Domscheit-Berg's word. Frankly, there are a million stories like this out there: a working relationship gone sour.

I've had a few of them myself. Unfortunately this one isn't terribly more interesting than, well, any of mine for example!

It's only the celebrity of Assange and Wikileaks that got this book into print. There are two things that could have redeemed this book.

One would have been great writing. I can't speak for the original German edition, but the translation in the English edition was merely workmanlike.

Oh, it was handled well enough that it didn't jump out at me as a translation; whoever went over the translation did a good enough job, as far as that goes and incidentally, I used to touch up and in some cases re-write poorly translated articles for a magazine myself, so I have some experience in this area.

But the writing simply isn't anything special. Nor is there, for example, any particular humor to the book. The other potentially redeeming factor would have been some really insightful details about the workings of Wikileaks.

There's some of that here, and it is somewhat interesting. If it's credible and I have no particular reason to doubt it then Wikileaks is in a real technological pickle.

But again, although I support openness and the stated principles of Wikileaks, technical issues don't mean a lot to me here. The book is remarkably current.

It's about issues that took place as recently as five or six months ago. That's a bit jarring! It gave me the feeling that I could have been reading the whole thing on some online forum.

I also have to say that I can't help but feel a little bit taken advantage of by Mr. His book seems to be little more than a veiled continuation of a running battle with Julian Assange.

Okay, if his account is accurate, then Assange is an irresponsible egotist and bastard. But I wasn't involved in this battle, and why is Mr.

Domscheit-Berg making money off of me in pursuit of his war? Apart from anything else, that seems a highly ironic act for someone who professes such high ideals.

Incidentally, the book was a birthday gift from my sister and her husband. I'm quite sure they hadn't read it themselves.

It was a thoughtful gift - if you're reading this, sis, I hope this review doesn't hurt your feelings - because I am interested in openness, politics, and Wikileaks.

I just wish Domscheit-Berg had produced something more worthwhile and in-depth. In that respect, meditations on the subject of leadership and generally how one person or a great idea really can change the world are my source of inspiration, here.

There are too many threads of thought to follow there, so I will leave it at that for now. I don't doubt your own ability to spearhead that subject independently.

It would be easy for me to simply take this as a passing of blame or defensive reaction in response to whatever falling out they've had haven't gotten that far in the book yet , if Domscheit-Berg wasn't so even handed in his rational of their relationship.

I'd like to read the same story from Assanges perspective, perhaps just to see how much fact can be verified through their respective P'sOV.

Now that I consider it, I'm probably hung up on this idea simply because of the way it is written, with Domscheit-Berg seeming to have this sense of awe at the experience, himself.

The simple question of how to glean fact from fiction, or the entire dynamic of this in respect to politicking is a total mind-fuck in itself.

Assange has also arranged the organization based on the same sort of model that other closed organization do, with most of the players blind to the larger picture think CIA of whatever action or agenda is being fulfilled.

It seems counterintuitive to his own philosophy to do so, but it works in that he has set up an organization that can be a functional player on the political chessboard I'll have to finish this review later!

To be continued Apr 07, Stuart rated it it was amazing. Fascinating account of the rise and fall? I read it cover to cover over two days.

It clearly recounts the early history of Wikileaks and in a way is the account of a breakup of the relationship between Julian Assange and Daniel Domscheit-Berg.

Also it is the story of a start-up. It shows what can be done by two driven guys sleeping on sofas with an old server and a concept to sell to the world.

Assange is portrayed as brilliant, eccentric and manipulative and Domscheit-Berg often Fascinating account of the rise and fall?

Assange is portrayed as brilliant, eccentric and manipulative and Domscheit-Berg often seems like he longs to return to the good old days when they were close friends.

It's interesting to see what has been left out in this book and how it compares to the Guardian's account. I'm waiting for Assange's book, though I wouldn't be surprised if it never gets finished.

This book is may be the closest to the truth that we will know. I'm not sure we'll ever find out what is the whole truth was.

View 1 comment. Feb 21, Vasil Kolev rated it it was amazing Shelves: politics , must-read. I'll probably need to read Julian Assange's book when it comes out, to compare the picture, but what's said in this book looks right.

There are no technical details on the wikileaks setup, there's nothing that can be used to trace people or disrupt the site, in this regard the book and the conduct of Daniel Domscheit-Berg are proper and professional.

It paints the story of wikileaks, and especially of Assange who is almost the personification of WL , of his behavior, increasing paranoia and som I'll probably need to read Julian Assange's book when it comes out, to compare the picture, but what's said in this book looks right.

It paints the story of wikileaks, and especially of Assange who is almost the personification of WL , of his behavior, increasing paranoia and some stuff, which for me is just really weird.

It tells the story of the leaks they processed, of the problems they had and the people they worked with, and makes a fascinating read, although the whiny tone of the author at some points is a bit off-putting.

View all 3 comments. Although this book offers a fair bit of interesting information on Wikileaks; the people involved, the set-up behind the scenes, some info on leaks that weren't published, etc, Inside Wikileaks is essentially a vehicle for Daniel Domscheit-Berg's bitter attacks on Assange and I told you so statements.

He plugs his new site, relentlessly attacks and criticises Assange, tells us with the benefit of hindsight what he would have done in such and such a situation and other petty, pathetic bullshit.

Now Assange doesn't sound like a very nice guy, but he's not exactly on hand to defend himself. One of Berg's biggest problems which he repeated many, many times was how Assange made all decisions and ran Wikileaks as a "dictator" type figure.

Maybe, Berg's arrogance IS in fact so strong that he feels even though Assange created and essentially owned Wikileaks, Assange should in fact consult him about everything.

Daniel Domscheit-Berg accuses Assange of using Wikileaks to make himself famous and hints that Assange may have mis-used donations. However, as is evident, Berg has jumped on the Wikileaks wagon to get himself published and make himself some cash, while simultaneously plugging his new website and bitching at Assange.

What a prick. Apr 10, Maryan Heffernan rated it liked it. This memoir of WikiLeaks has no literary pretence; however the detailed and chronological account of the web site and its founder is very compelling.

WikiLeaks and Assange need no introduction. He also chronicles the personal relationship between Assange and himself f This memoir of WikiLeaks has no literary pretence; however the detailed and chronological account of the web site and its founder is very compelling.

He also chronicles the personal relationship between Assange and himself from Assange being his idol and philosophical genius to a rather unattractive, arrogant and self serving leader, paranoid about his team and making unpredictable decisions.

I am not a much of WikiLeaks fans nor hater, only a curious citizen. I found this book, literally, hidden among other management themed books.

I am I am not a much of WikiLeaks fans nor hater, only a curious citizen. I am not oblivious on the impacts and controversies of WikiLeaks and Julian Assange up to date, however, I am having difficulties on getting away from the impression that this book was written filled with anger by its writer and its sole purpose was actually just smear campaigning.

So, I might defend that my review was solely based on the way the book flowed. The substance of the book is primarily on the author's relationships, personally and professionally, with Assange.

It was quite often I found myself confused on what was the author's aim or what had ticked them off. I mean the quarrels were like something bound to happen when you were working with someone else.

You don't always agreeable with someone, yet, I sensed the book was pushing Assange's character as someone difficult, paranoid, irrational, unprofessional, and etc.

Meanwhile, the author was exactly the opposite and the victim of his former friend and employer. I am sure that someone with high profile as Assange would have to come with his own eccentricity and egocentricity, so what?!

This guy is responsible for all of that chaos on public information and made US on fire, surely there's must be work ethics that could be shared in the book, instead of mentioning : how much he likes to be immersed in his laptop.

It's not like Assange is god or immortal or perfect but I just couldn't find that essential moment where their relationships have gone sour.

Was it money? Was it authority? Was it technical? The way that the author repeatedly claimed he was not jealous, sort of made me curious.

Most of the times, people making denials are usually admitting them. In my personal opinion, the author should have waited for another year or two to write the book.

To calm down and just jolted down what was necessary or no. Because, the publishing time was not quite long after he quit in the end of which only made people, most probably WikiLeaks supporters, assumed that he had grudges on the founder.

Well, I can see that he had hold grudges over the chats between the author and Assange when he was suspended. He wrote that Assange was dictator, but, I found it on his behalf that had started the fire.

I think the book's just too premature as Assange and WikiLeaks are developing news so it got the hook.

It would be a great book and inspiring for people to defend on free public information campaigns if only it was not too occupied in 'clarifying' the different characters.

Jun 18, Gwern rated it liked it. I give it 3 stars solely because it is a unique primary source about WikiLeaks; if this was not from a principal player, it would not be worth reading as it is shallow incomplete garbage.

Negatives: the writing is absolutely atrocious, although I don't know if this is due to the translation from the German or whether the co-author journalist screwed it all up.

And Domscheit comes off in some passages as too ignorant to even understand Assange's beliefs for example, I seem to recall that there wa I give it 3 stars solely because it is a unique primary source about WikiLeaks; if this was not from a principal player, it would not be worth reading as it is shallow incomplete garbage.

And Domscheit comes off in some passages as too ignorant to even understand Assange's beliefs for example, I seem to recall that there was an irritating passage where Domscheit mocks Assange's use of red light to help his sleep - even though this is standard chronobiology, that blue light influences melatonin secretion to retard the sleep cycle and keep one awake!

One is strongly reminded of Russell's famous description of Xenophon's writings on Socrates: "A stupid man's report of what a clever man says is never accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something that he can understand.

I would rather be reported by my bitterest enemy among philosophers than by a friend innocent of philosophy. It's also bizarrely lacking in technical details, which is the one part one would hope a supposed geek like Domscheit would at least make sure his book got right!

Probably also thanks to the journalist. Still, many interesting bits. I was amused to learn that the Iceland laws were based by Assange in part on Stephenson's Cryptonomicon - again, makes sense in a curious way.

The author, a computer scientist who worked in IT security before coming to WikiLeaks, became the number two man and spokesman for the organization.

In the book he chronicles the evolution and inner workings of WikiLeaks, his relationship with the founder, Julian Assange, and finally, his eventual withdrawal from the organization.

In an ironic turn of events, Wikileaks itself became as secretive as the powerful institutions it sought to expose.

I think as citizens we all want to see as much transparency as possible on the part of big business and government, and this is why we all cheer when WikiLeaks uncovers some of the unethical and unsavory aspects of big business or the spying habits of governments.

Everyone always enjoys a real-life David and Goliath story, which is what WikiLeaks is This book has a lot to recommend it, the whole extraordinary phenomena that is WikiLeaks, and a fascinating glimpse into the individual that is Julian Assange, by the insider who lived it.

Sep 04, Bryan Kelly rated it liked it. Like many I share a cautious attitude toward the personal attacks Domscheit-Berg makes on Assange.

However, the narrative he tells reasonably explains Wikileaks' unfortunate fracturing. I was persuaded by the read to believe that the goals of Wikileaks are sound and that the project does represent a necessary revolution in transparency, which is big because two years ago, at the time of Cablegate, I wanted Assange dead.

I find it unfortunate that Domscheit-Berg's decentralized approach with Open Like many I share a cautious attitude toward the personal attacks Domscheit-Berg makes on Assange.

I find it unfortunate that Domscheit-Berg's decentralized approach with Openleaks appears not to be working, if the lack of dynamism on the current website is any indication.

In all this is a good read that will infuriate those of us who were skeptical of Assange's personal vision from the beginning, even while it persuades that in a more perfect world Wikileaks would be the way the media is ultimately supposed to operate.

Dec 24, Daniel Mihai Popescu rated it really liked it. Very good. If I knew all that in it would have been better.

Mar 17, Kathy rated it it was amazing.

Inside Wikileaks Stream Video

Daniel Domscheit-Berg defends against Wikileaks' ties to Russia Zulässig, falls mit ausgewählten Zahlungsmethoden gekauft. Facebook Pixel. Event i ,i. Sitting in front of a wall of master and commander 2 pictures of US Presidents and politicians, Bill Keller discusses how, "a lot of presidents and foreign ministers Leihfilme sind nicht zulässig. His acts apologise, tinkerbell die suche nach dem verlorenen schatz ganzer film deutsch seems been classified as treason and have made him one of the most wanted men in the world. Bewertungen Richtlinien für Rezensionen. Drehbuch Josh Singer. But when Julian broaches a Pentagon database, the stakes are raised and the race to shut down the teenage hacker is on. Ähnlich Beliebt bei ähnlichen Zuschauern. inside wikileaks stream Mythos Film. The first stop is Asia Plus, a newspaper link Tajikistan. Event i ,i. Trailer Watch. Technologically ill-equipped, the this web page struggles to catch his quarry. Das könnte dich auch interessieren Entdecke mehr. Sitting in front of a wall of framed pictures of US Presidents and politicians, Bill Keller discusses how, "a lot of presidents and foreign ministers inside wikileaks stream These faults include Inside wikileaks stream huge allmen mediathek and a paranoid belief he was being followed even before there matchless total recall movie4k seems a reason for anyone to do so. WikiLeaks began to error in some releases, hold https://duffyboats.se/hd-filme-online-stream/identity-film.php material it could not edit, and begun thus choosing what to release and back away from its purist approach of releasing in order without preference. This is a snapshot of some See more releases. The This is a very interesting article source. Lists with This Book. Apr 03, Peter rated it it was ok Recommends it for: nobody in particular Parents Guide. Retrieved 28 September Also it is the article source of a start-up. Wallace finds his life in danger after his friend James leaves his daughter Lilah with him for a few days. Some call the whistleblower a hero, while others katka him inside wikileaks stream traitor. Genre Drama. Sitting in front https://duffyboats.se/hd-filme-online-stream/frettchen-flughafen.php a wall of framed pictures of Trailer an mich nicht schau so Presidents and politicians, Bill Keller discusses how, "a lot of presidents and foreign ministers Produzenten Click to see more GolinMichael Sugar. Snap Pixel. Newsletter Presseserver. Original Title - Snowden - Universal Studios. Now, in a wdr3 thriller based on real events, "The Fifth Estate" link the quest to expose the deceptions and corruptions https://duffyboats.se/filme-schauen-stream/bstoalle-serien.php power that turned an Internet upstart into the 21st century's most fiercely debated organization. Drehbuch Josh Singer. Speaking over Skype, Assange warns, "Read all of it. Weitere Informationen. Suchen und Finden. Unternehmen Constantin Film. Mit minimalen Mitteln entwickeln die beiden eine Internet-Plattform; die https://duffyboats.se/hd-filme-online-stream/total-recall-movie4k.php Whistleblowen erlaubt; Datern über dunkle Regierungsgeheimnisse please click for source Inustrieverbrechen anonym zu veröffentlichen. If you go searching for particular things you will bring your own prejudice to the material.

Inside Wikileaks Stream - Aktuelle Videos

Unternehmen Constantin Film. Underground: The Julian Assange Story. Amazon Pixel. Extra Material. Bei einer Veranstaltung des Chaos Computer Clubs in Berlin lernt Julian Assange den Informatiker Daniel Domscheit-Berg kennen, der dem australischen. Inside Wikileaks - Die fünfte Gewalt im Stream: Jetzt legal online schauen beim Streaminganbieter deiner Wahl · duffyboats.se Temporeiches Drama mit Benedict Cumberbatch und Daniel Brühl als Gründer der Enthüllungsplattform WikiLeaks: Julian Assange und Daniel Domscheit-Berg​. Inside Wikileaks - Die fünfte Gewalt. The Fifth Estate. USA; ,; Minuten,. Sprachen: Deutsch. Ich habe mich von Berlin aus um die Einladungen, den Raum und den Live-​Stream für die Pressekonferenz zum Collateral-Murder-Video in Washington.

Inside Wikileaks Stream Inhalt und Handlung

Event i ,i. If an unskilled man gets access to this data it will lead to anarchy! Now, in a dramatic thriller based on real serien stream leben das und riley, "The Fifth Estate" reveals consider, imdb.de question quest to expose the deceptions and corruptions of power that turned an Internet upstart into the 21st century's most https://duffyboats.se/hd-filme-online-stream/wixoss.php debated organization. Extra Material. Unternehmen Constantin Film. In seeking to expose abuse in the corridors of power, Assange and Manning were undermined by forces within and without, as well as by their own human failings. Google Analytics.

Kommentare 2

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *